 |
If
you can read this in English you should thank the
soldiers
that defended you and the teachers that taught you.
TRIBOROUGH MUST GO
New
York’s “Triborough Amendment”, enacted in 1982, mandates that
public employee union contracts must remain in effect even after the contract actually
expires. As a result, public employees
are entitled to their usual perks, including automatic salary increases and
fringe benefits, regardless of changing fiscal conditions or changing local
priorities and regardless of an expired contract. Obviously, the Triborough Amendment creates a
disincentive for teachers and other public employees to accept terms and
conditions less costly than those allowed in their previous contract and it
drastically hampers the employer, i.e. the taxpayer, to effectively negotiate
changes in response to a depressed economy. Recently, the impact of the Triborough
Amendment was illustrated when Governor Cuomo’s attempt to negotiate a less
costly contract with a public employee union initially failed. In the words of one union member, “We have
the Triborough Amendment- why do this to yourself?”
When teachers
and other public employees complain they are working without a contract, they
simply mean that they have not gotten an increase in their automatic increase,
aka, step. They mean, on average, their
annual salary increased only 2% instead of the usual 6%. This explains how the so called “salary
freezes” negotiated by some school districts did not lower costs, but increased
State costs by $140 million. In addition,
the Amendment adds almost $300 million a year to school budgets across the
State and these figures are only part of the story. Since the Triborough Amendment makes it
easier for unions to resist proposals for more significant and lasting changes
to work rules, staffing requirements and fringe benefits, the full cost of the
Amendment is incalculable, as is its affect on student education.
Governor
Cuomo’s two percent cap on county, municipal, school and special district
property tax levies makes the case for repealing the Triborough Amendment. In order to live within the cap without
disrupting public services, local governments and school districts need greater
flexibility to restrain automatic pay increase and to restructure the most
costly aspects of their collective bargaining agreements.
As expected, Unions
have fiercely fought any attempt to repeal the Triborough Amendment, frequently
asserting that the Triborough Amendment was a quid pro quo enacted to make up
for outlawing public sector
strikes. Not so! It was President Reagan’s’ 1981 dismissal and
replacement of striking air traffic controllers and a prolonged economic boom
that swelled government tax coffers that enabled local governments to appease
unions which led to a decrease in public sector strikes.
Furthermore,
when the Triborough Amendment is repealed, it would be replaced with an earlier
version, the Triborough Doctrine, which would preserve major elements of public
sector contracts, but at the same time, would give employers the ability to
truly freeze employee wage increases in the absence of a new contract. The result would restore true collective
bargaining to a system that now extends it to unions but denies collective
bargaining to the taxpayer. New York State’s fiscal stability demands
that Triborough be repealed, now.
|